Peran Teknologi Kultur Daging dalam Percepatan Ketahanan Pangan Global
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/polygon.v3i6.838Keywords:
Bioethics, Biotechnology, Cultured Meat, Food Security, SustainabilityAbstract
Rapid global population growth has led to climate change and agricultural land degradation, posing significant challenges to the stability of global food security. The traditional livestock sector is known to absorb high levels of greenhouse gas emissions that can accelerate natural resource degradation and require innovative and sustainable approaches to meet the demand for animal protein. This study aims to analyze the contribution of cultured meat technology as an ethical and environmentally friendly alternative to improving global food security. This study uses a desk study method that addresses the technical, social, economic, and ethical aspects of cultured meat production. The analysis results indicate that the application of this technology has the potential to reduce land use and carbon emissions by up to 70% compared to conventional livestock systems, in addition to reducing animal suffering and the risk of zoonotic disease transmission. However, its application still faces several obstacles, such as high production costs, dependence on whey-based culture media, and difficulties in halal certification and public acceptance. These findings underscore the importance of synergy between scientists, governments, and religious authorities to ensure the safety, effectiveness, and equivalence of technology with ethical principles and socio-cultural values. With strong regulatory support and ongoing research, cultured meat technology has the potential to be a strategic solution for building a resilient, equitable, and environmentally responsible global food system.
Downloads
References
Arango, L., Chaudhury, S. H., & Septianto, F. (2023). The role of demand‐based scarcity appeals in promoting cultured meat. Psychology & Marketing, 40(8), 1501–1520. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21821
Ariningtyas, N., Syarifah, U., Duhita, M. R., & Imamudin, M. (2025). Konsep halalan thayyiban dalam produksi daging kultur dengan teknologi stem cell: Studi Al-Qur'an tematik. Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu al-Qur'an dan Tafsir, 5(2), 455–473.
Bryant, C. (2020). Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: An updated review (2018–2020). Applied Sciences, 10(15), 5201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155201
Chair, S. (2025). Optimalisasi produksi dalam negeri untuk mewujudkan ketahanan daging tanpa ketergantungan impor. ARMADA: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3(4), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.55681/armada.v3i4.1613
Food and Agriculture Organization. (2017). Livestock solutions for climate change. https://www.fao.org/family-farming/detail/en/c/1634679/
Fristikawati, Y., & Nugroho, F. H. E. (2023). Daging buatan hasil rekayasa genetika ditinjau dari kehalalannya dan hukum perlindungan konsumen. Jurnal Perkotaan, 16(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.25170/perkotaan.v16i1.5733
Fristikawati, Y., & Nugroho, F. H. E. (2024). Daging buatan hasil rekayasa genetika ditinjau dari kehalalannya dan hukum perlindungan konsumen. Jurnal Perkotaan, 16(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.25170/perkotaan.v16i1.5733
Good Food Institute. (2019). Review and gap analysis of life cycle assessment studies of cultivated meat. https://gfi.org/resource/life-cycle-assessment-of-cultivated-meat/
Hasibuan, T. U. S., & Muslim, A. (2022). Inovasi industri daging buatan dalam perspektif fikih Syafi'i. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 7(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v7i1.1323
Hasibuan, T. U. S., & Muslim, A. (2025). Inovasi industri daging buatan dalam perspektif fikih Syafi'i. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 7(1), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v7i1.1323
Hendriadi, A., & Ariani, S. (2020). Pengentasan rumah tangga rawan pangan dan gizi: Besaran, penyebab, dampak, dan kebijakan. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 38(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v38n1.2020.13-27
Jumiono, A. (2024). Identifikasi titik kritis kehalalan bahan hewani dan produk turunan hewan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pangan Halal, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30997/jiph.v4i2.9909
Laestadius, L. I., & Caldwell, M. A. (2015). Is the future of meat palatable? Perceptions of in vitro meat as evidenced by online news comments. Public Health Nutrition, 18(13), 2457–2467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980015000622
Lee, H., Kim, M., & Park, S. (2022). Development of serum-free media and growth factor optimization for sustainable cultured meat production. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 101423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.101423
Ma'had Aly MUDI Samalanga, & Muhajjir. (2024). Status hukum konsumsi daging kultur jaringan menurut perspektif fikih Syafi'iyyah. Jurnal Al-Nadhair, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.61433/alnadhair.v3i01.49
Nawaz, A. H., Hussain, A., Fujian, W., Zhang, W. L., Zheng, J. H., Zheng Hai, J., & Zhang, L. (2022). Future of cultured meat production: Hopes and hurdles. Future of Food: Journal on Food, Agriculture and Society, 10(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-202204136014
Newbery, F., Qi, A., & Fitt, B. D. (2016). Modelling impacts of climate change on arable crop diseases: Progress, challenges and applications. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 32, 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.07.002
Newton, P., & Blaustein-Rejto, D. (2021). Social and economic opportunities and challenges of plant-based and cultured meat for rural producers in the US. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 624270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.624270
Nguyen, T. T., Grote, U., Neubacher, F., Do, M. H., & Paudel, G. P. (2023). Security risks from climate change and environmental degradation: Implications for sustainable land use transformation in the Global South. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 63, 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101322
Pauzan, I., Falahudin, O., & Falahudin, A. (2024). Potensi emisi gas rumah kaca dari pengolahan limbah peternakan sapi potong pada peternakan rakyat di Kecamatan Paseh Kabupaten Sumedang. Tropical Livestock Science Journal, 3(1), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.31949/tlsj.v3i1.11466
Purwayantie, S., & Saputri, N. E. (2023). Tren pangan global. Penerbit NEM.
Qotadah, H., Al Anshory, A., & Achmad, A. D. (2024). Cultured meat for Indonesian Muslim communities: A review of maslahah and prospect. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 7(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i2.5476
Qudsiyah, U. S., & Tsania, A. A. (2024). Halal perspective review of cultured meat stem cell method. Journal of Agri-Food Science and Technology, 5(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.12928/jafost.v5i2.11923
Rahmawati, R. N. (2024). Analisis kesejahteraan hewan dan status halal daging kultur laboratorium dalam perspektif iptek dan hukum Islam. Kaunia: Integration and Interconnection Islam and Science Journal, 20(1), 23–34.
Rumawas, V. V., Nayoan, H., & Kumayas, N. (2021). Peran pemerintah dalam mewujudkan ketahanan pangan di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Governance, 1(1), 1–12.
Sinke, P., Odegard, I., & Broeze, J. (2023). Ex-ante life cycle assessment of commercial-scale cultivated meat production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 28(5), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-023-02184-3
Soleymani, S., Naghib, S. M., & Mozafari, M. R. (2024). An overview of cultured meat and stem cell bioprinting: How to make it, challenges and prospects, environmental effects, society’s culture and the influence of religions. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 18, 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101307
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). FDA seeks input on labeling of food made with cultured seafood cells. https://www.fda.gov/food/hfp-constituent-updates/fda-seeks-input-labeling-food-made-cultured-seafood-cells
United Nations. (2024). World population prospects. https://population.un.org/wpp/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Polygon : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
