Penerapan Metode Oreste pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Alasan Terbaik Diyah SMP Galih Agung Memilih Persantren Darularafah Raya

Authors

  • Nursakila Ena Anjani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rika Hanifah Tanjung Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Sofiah Aini Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Khairunnisa Ani Putri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v3i5.803

Keywords:

Decision Support Systems, Educational Choices, Islamic Boarding Schools , Multi-Criteria Decision Making, ORESTE Method

Abstract

N the rapidly evolving digital era, decision-making has become a critical aspect across various fields, including education, where choices such as selecting an Islamic boarding school (pondok pesantren) are often influenced by complex and subjective factors. This study addresses the dilemma faced by Diyah, a junior high school student, in determining the best reasons for choosing Pondok Pesantren Darularafah Raya, highlighting the limitations of manual, personal-based processes that fail to systematically consider measurable criteria like educational quality, learning environment, facilities, discipline, and instilled religious values. The advancement of information technology provides a solution through Decision Support Systems (DSS), utilizing the ORESTE (Organization, Rangement Et Synthèse De Données Relationnelles) method, which effectively processes ordinal data to produce objective rankings based on subjective yet structured preferences. Unlike other methods such as SAW or AHP that rely on numerical data, ORESTE emphasizes relative preference weights, making it suitable for individual decision-making contexts like educational choices. The novelty of this research lies in applying ORESTE in a DSS focused on analyzing an individual's best reasons for selecting a pesantren, aiming to reduce subjective bias and enhance rationality. The primary objective is to develop a DSS using the ORESTE method to analyze and determine Diyah's optimal reasons for choosing the pesantren. Through this, the system is expected to accelerate evaluation processes, improve objectivity, and identify dominant factors influencing educational decisions. Findings from the implementation demonstrate accurate rankings that prioritize key criteria, leading to more efficient and data-driven outcomes. Implications include aiding students, schools, and educators in understanding influential factors, fostering objective assessment systems, and serving as a reference for future studies integrating MCDM methods with computer-based systems in personalized educational decision-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aura, R., et al. (2021). Sistem pendukung keputusan dalam menentukan pemilihan jasa pengiriman ikan hias yang tepat dengan menggunakan metode Organization Rangement et Sythese de Donnes Relationneles (ORESTE). Jurnal Cyber Tech, 4(6).

Barankiewicz, T., & Przywora, B. (2022). On methodological unity and diversity of legal sciences: A contribution to basic methodological research. Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej, 1(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.36280/AFPiFS.2022.3.5

Bekele, M. S., & Kenea, A. (2024). Determinants of parental school choice: A systematic review of the literature. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 8(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v8i1.7296

Chen, Z., Liang, N., Zhang, H., Li, H., Yang, Y., Zong, X., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Shi, N. (2023). Harnessing the power of clinical decision support systems: Challenges and opportunities. Open Heart, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002432

Chung, H. Y., Chang, J. C., & Chang, K. H. (2025). Enhancing multi-criteria decision-making through a novel feedforward neural network system based on group experience. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 16(9), 103552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2025.103552

Cicillini, S. (2025). Shopper, shopping and shopping bag: Investigating the use of Anglicisms in Italian. International Journal of Linguistics, 17(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v17i6.22993

de Oliveira, R. S. M., Morais, D. C., & Siebert, J. (2023). Developing and evaluating new alternatives for urban mobility: A case study of a Brazilian city. Pesquisa Operacional, 43(spe1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-7438.2023.043spe1.00263440

Fahriansyah, M. B., & Rahman, M. (2024). Metode ORESTE dalam menentukan kualitas mengajar guru pada SMK Harapan Mekar berbasis Android. Jurnal Ilmiah Dosen, 1. http://kti.potensi-utama.ac.id/index.php/JID

Graci, R., & Capone, A. (2023). Perspectives on the semantics/pragmatics debate: Insights from aphasia research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(September), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1250170

Gupta, A., Basu, D., Ghantasala, R., Qiu, S., & Gadiraju, U. (2022). To trust or not to trust: How a conversational interface affects trust in a decision support system. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (WWW 2022), 3531–3540. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512248

Hua, Z., Jing, X., & Martínez, L. (2023). An ELICIT information-based ORESTE method for failure mode and effect analysis considering risk correlation with GRA-DEMATEL. Information Fusion, 93, 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.01.012

Husein, I., Anggraini, D., & Siregar, R. M. R. (2024). Decision support system selecting the best skincare using the ORESTE method. Mathline: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.31943/mathline.v9i2.635

Nurjannah, Z., Sesmiarni, R., Hamda, M., Wahyuni, D., & W. E. P., Y. (2024). Penggunaan metode Make A Match untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar PAI kelas IV SDN 04 Manggilang. Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(February), 4–6.

Nursalimah, S. (2021). Tafsir ayat Al-Qur’an tentang metode pendidikan Islam. Pena Cendikia, 4(2), 11–22.

Ramadan, A. Y. B., Hastono, T., & Saputra, N. (2020). Penentuan penyewa tanah kas Desa Potorono menggunakan metode ORESTE dan Besson-Rank berbasis Android. Jurnal Dinamika Informatika, 9(2), 42–54. https://jdi.upy.ac.id/index.php/jdi/article/view/158

Sari, P., Purba, S., Rangkuti, I., & Nasrun, N. (2023). Perspectives on educational leadership and decision-making in the era of digitalization. JMSP (Jurnal Manajemen dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 8(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.17977/um025v8i12023p34

Suarnatha, I. P. D. (2023). Sistem pendukung keputusan seleksi ketua BEM menggunakan metode profile matching. Journal of Information System Management (JOISM), 4(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.24076/joism.2023v4i2.952

Sudipa, I. G. I., Cakranegara, P. A., Ningtyas, M. W. A., Efendi, E., & Wahidin, A. J. (2022). Penilaian aspek keaktifan belajar mahasiswa menggunakan metode ORESTE. Remik, 6(3), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.33395/remik.v6i3.11628

Utomo, S. O., Abadi, L. P., & Lukman, L. (2024). Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan pelanggan terbaik pada Omega Laundry menggunakan metode SAW. Jurnal Riset dan Aplikasi Mahasiswa Informatika (JRAMI), 5(3), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.30998/jrami.v5i3.9017

Yerlikaya, M. A., Yildiz, K., & Keskin, B. N. (2023). Solution proposal for completed preference structure in ORESTE method. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31561-4

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30

How to Cite

Nursakila Ena Anjani, Rika Hanifah Tanjung, Sofiah Aini, & Khairunnisa Ani Putri. (2025). Penerapan Metode Oreste pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dalam Pemilihan Alasan Terbaik Diyah SMP Galih Agung Memilih Persantren Darularafah Raya. Bilangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 3(5), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v3i5.803

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.