Reconceptualizing Student Agency in AI-Supported STEM Learning: A Qualitative Study of Autonomy, Regulation, and Dependency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/polygon.v4i2.962Keywords:
AI-Supported Learning, Educational Technology, Learning Autonomy, Qualitative Study, Self-Regulated LearningAbstract
This study explores student agency in Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported STEM learning environments, addressing a critical gap in existing literature that predominantly focuses on learning outcomes rather than learner-centered processes. Drawing on an interpretive qualitative approach, this research investigates how students experience autonomy, self-regulation, and decision-making when interacting with AI technologies in STEM education. Data were collected from 15 participants engaged in AI-supported learning through in-depth semi-structured interviews, supported by observations and document analysis. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and meanings related to student agency. The findings reveal that student agency is a dynamic and multidimensional construct shaped by the interplay between technological affordances and learner engagement. Four major themes emerged: enhanced autonomy, development of self-regulated learning, negotiated decision-making, and ambivalent dependency on AI. While AI technologies provide adaptive support that empowers students to take control of their learning, they also introduce the risk of over-reliance, which may reduce cognitive engagement. This study contributes to the theoretical advancement of student agency by conceptualizing it as a spectrum rather than a fixed attribute, highlighting the dual role of AI as both an enabler and a constraint. The findings offer important pedagogical implications for designing AI-supported STEM learning environments that promote active, reflective, and responsible learning. Future research is recommended to explore this phenomenon across diverse contexts and through longitudinal designs.
Downloads
References
Abdelfattah, M., Ayadi, H., Nassim, S., & Elwaly, E. M. A. (2025). AI-animated videos in PjBL: Enhancing students' engagement, motivation, and critical thinking in content courses. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174837847.74678751/v1
Adeoye, M. A., Prastikawati, E. F., & Abimbowo, Y. O. (2024). Empowering learning: Pedagogical strategies for advancing 21st-century skills and quality education. Journal of Nonformal Education, 10(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i1.1451
Ahmad, K., Iqbal, W., El-Hassan, A., Qadir, J., Benhaddou, D., Ayyash, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2024). Data-driven artificial intelligence in education: A comprehensive review. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3314610
Al Harrasi, N., Al Subhi, N., Al Harthy, S., & Al Habsi, J. (2025). Learner perspectives on AI teacher effectiveness: The role of engagement, motivation, efficiency, and educational experience. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101950
Alam, A. (2021). Should robots replace teachers? Mobilisation of AI and learning analytics in education. 2021 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, and Control (ICAC3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC353642.2021.9697300
Alhur, A. A., Khlaif, Z. N., Hamamra, B., & Hussein, E. (2025). Paradox of AI in higher education: Qualitative inquiry into AI dependency among educators in Palestine. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e74947–e74947. https://doi.org/10.2196/74947
Aysan, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence as a distributed actor: Rethinking organizational theory through sociotechnical networks. Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 4(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAIA52025546
Bernsteiner, R., Ploder, C., Su, Y., Gou, J., & Yu, X. (2025). Design principles of real-time students' performance monitoring in simulation-based business education. Procedia Computer Science, 266, 1147–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.08.142
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Cui, Y., Tang, L., Chen, Y., & Meng, Y. (2025). Unveiling the influences: How self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, and test anxiety shape L2 learner agency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 54(6), 59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-025-10175-z
Ezzaim, A., Dahbi, A., Aqqal, A., & Haidine, A. (2025). AI-based learning style detection in adaptive learning systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12(3), 731–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-024-00328-9
Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
Ghafarpour, H., & Moinzadeh, A. (2020). A dynamic systems analysis of classrooms: Teacher experience and student motivation. Learning Environments Research, 23(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09293-y
Girma, A. H. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in shaping human interaction and cognitive function. Kotebe Journal of Education, 3(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.61489/30053447.3(1).69
Gomez, C., Cho, S. M., Ke, S., Huang, C.-M., & Unberath, M. (2025). Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: A taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1521066
Gupta, N., Ali, K., Jiang, D., Fink, T., & Du, X. (2024). Beyond autonomy: Unpacking self-regulated and self-directed learning through the lens of learner agency- a scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06476-x
Hong, X., & Guo, L. (2025). Effects of AI-enhanced multi-display language teaching systems on learning motivation, cognitive load management, and learner autonomy. Education and Information Technologies, 30(12), 17155–17189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13472-1
Huang, J., Zhong, Y., & Chen, X. (2025). Adaptive and personalized learning in STEM education using high-performance computing and artificial intelligence. The Journal of Supercomputing, 81(8), 981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-025-07481-7
Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686
Jin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students' self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00406-5
Katsenou, R., Kotsidis, K., Papadopoulou, A., Anastasiadis, P., & Deliyannis, I. (2025). Beyond assistance: Embracing AI as a collaborative co-agent in education. Education Sciences, 15(8), 1006. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081006
Kayal, A. (2024). Transformative pedagogy: A comprehensive framework for AI integration in education (pp. 247–270). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72410-7_14
Kharroubi, S., & ElMediouni, A. (2024). Conceptual review: Cultivating learner autonomy through self-directed learning & self-regulated learning: A socio-constructivist exploration. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1649
Kluwer, E. S., Karremans, J. C., Riedijk, L., & Knee, C. R. (2020). Autonomy in relatedness: How need fulfillment interacts in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(4), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219867964
Koul, S., & Nayar, B. (2021). The holistic learning educational ecosystem: A classroom 4.0 perspective. Higher Education Quarterly, 75(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12271
Lee, F., & Wong, S. W. (2025). Surgical education reimagined: The convergence of learning theories and artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Education, 26(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08039-0
Leon, C., Lipuma, J., & Oviedo-Torres, X. (2025). Artificial intelligence in STEM education: A transdisciplinary framework for engagement and innovation. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1619888
Lin, C.-C., Huang, A. Y. Q., & Lu, O. H. T. (2023). Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00260-y
Lujak, M., Slavkovik, M., Lebis, A., Vermeulen, M., & Doniec, A. (2022). Objective tests in automated grading of computer science courses: An overview (pp. 239–268). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04662-9_12
Luo, L. (2025). Fostering higher-order thinking skills of undergraduate students: The integration of blended learning in college English teaching. 14th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology (ICEIT), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT64364.2025.10975908
Mingfeng, L., & Wang, Y. (2026). Artificial intelligence in the classroom: Implications for pedagogical design and student agency in secondary education. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8166344/v1
Nghiem, X.-H., Yadav, R., Yadav, M., Dewasiri, N. J., & Ranasinghe, A. (2025). Project-based learning and inquiry-based learning. In Exploration of K-12 Teaching and Learning for Teacher Educators (pp. 231–260). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9370-3.ch009
Norm Lien, Y.-C., Wu, W.-J., & Lu, Y.-L. (2020). How well do teachers predict students' actions in solving an ill-defined problem in STEM education: A solution using sequential pattern mining. IEEE Access, 8, 134976–134986. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010168
Pacheco, A. J., Boude Figueredo, O. R., Chiappe, A., & Fontán de Bedout, L. (2025). AI-powered learning analytics for metacognitive and socioemotional development: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1672901
Piaget, J., & Cook, M. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children (5th ed., Vol. 8). International Universities Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-000
Ponomariovienė, J., & Jakavonytė-Staškuvienė, D. (2025). Manifestation of learner agency in primary education: Goal setting, implementation, and reflection in the context of competency-based learning. Behavioral Sciences, 15(8), 1116. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15081116
Rao, L., Tian, Y., & Atento, R. G. (2025). Adoption and perceived effectiveness of AI in education: Personalization, outcomes, and equity. International Journal of Health & Business Analytics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.65166/qgq89291
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2023). Self-determination theory. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 6229–6235). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2025). Integrating AI and learning analytics for data-driven pedagogical decisions and personalized interventions in education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09897-9
Salgado Granda, B., Inzhivotkina, Y., Ibáñez Apolo, M. F., & Ugarte Fajardo, J. G. (2024). Educational innovation: Exploring the potential of generative artificial intelligence in cognitive schema building. Edutec, Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa, (89), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.21556/edutec.2024.89.3251
Salman, M., Ganie, S. A., & Saleem, I. (2020). The concept of competence: A thematic review and discussion. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(6/7), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2019-0171
Shocheb, A., Ibrohim, I., & Muntholib, M. (2025). The effect of the problem-oriented project-based learning model assisted by artificial intelligence on students' problem-solving and communication skills. Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 10(02), 424–441. https://doi.org/10.33503/ebio.v10i02.1551
Shogren, K. A., & Raley, S. K. (2022). Causal agency theory: A theoretical framework for understanding self-determination. In Self-Determination and Causal Agency Theory (pp. 29–36). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04260-7_3
Shuell, T. J. (2021). Learning theory, instructional theory, and adaptation. In Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction (pp. 277–302). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003163145-24
Sidiropoulos, E. (2022). The influence of higher education on student learning and agency for sustainability transition. Sustainability, 14(5), 3098. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053098
Siu, K. W. M., Zou, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, K., & Zhao, T. (2025). Dynamic scaffolding: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in urban design education. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-025-00060-7
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of problem-based learning (PBL) in STEM education: Using expert wisdom and research to frame educational practice. Education Sciences, 12(10), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025). AI-driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation. Sustainable Development, 33(2), 1921–1947. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3221
Taber, K. S. (2020). Mediated learning leading development—the social development theory of Lev Vygotsky. In Social Development Theory (pp. 277–291). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_19
Tan, A.-L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2023a). STEM problem solving: Inquiry, concepts, and reasoning. Science & Education, 32(2), 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2
Tan, H., & Kidman, G. (2025). Twenty-first century skills and STEM education: A review of literature. In Knowledge Generation in STEM and STEAM Education (pp. 127–173). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03247-8_5
Taub, M., Sawyer, R., Smith, A., Rowe, J., Azevedo, R., & Lester, J. (2020). The agency effect: The impact of student agency on learning, emotions, and problem-solving behaviors in a game-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 147, 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103781
Tseng, J.-J., Chai, C. S., Tan, L., & Park, M. (2022). A critical review of research on technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in language teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868531
Valquaresma, A. (2024). Creativity, agency and meaning-making: Unfolding developmental possibilities in twenty-first-century learning environments. In Twenty-First-Century Learning (pp. 105–126). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73393-2_5
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Xi, J., & Lantolf, J. P. (2021). Scaffolding and the zone of proximal development: A problematic relationship. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12260
Xiao, K., & He, Y. (2025). Adaptive AI agent systems for personalized learning: Frameworks, algorithms, and practical applications in education. 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education (ICAIE), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIE64856.2025.11158641
Xu, X., Qiao, L., Cheng, N., Liu, H., & Zhao, W. (2025). Enhancing self-regulated learning and learning experience in generative AI environments: The critical role of metacognitive support. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 1842–1863. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13599
Yekollu, R. K., Bhimraj Ghuge, T., Sunil Biradar, S., Haldikar, S. V., & Farook Mohideen Abdul Kader, O. (2024). AI-driven personalized learning paths: Enhancing education through adaptive systems. In Knowledge Generation in Education (pp. 507–517). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3191-6_38
Yildiz Durak, H., & Onan, A. (2025). A systematic review of AI-based feedback in educational settings. Journal of Computational Social Science, 8(4), 96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-025-00428-1
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Effective Learning Environments (pp. 35–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zebua, N. (2024). Evaluating the impact of GenAI in high school education: A critical review. Polygon: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 2(6), 79–85. https://doi.org/10.62383/polygon.v2i6.296
Zebua, N., & Ziraluo, Y. P. B. (2026). Bridging the gap: Integrating GenAI into secondary science curricula. In Harnessing Generative Artificial Intelligence for Science Education (pp. 137–162). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-2913-0.ch005
Zebua, N., Ibrohim, I., & Sulisetijono, S. (2025). Exploring the level of AI (artificial intelligence) digital literacy and creative thinking skills in high school students. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(1), 510–520. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i1.14782
Zebua, N., Ziraluo, Y. P. B., & Zebua, E. N. K. (2025). An investigation into artificial intelligence literacy among biology education students as a foundation for developing an AI-integrated curriculum in learning planning courses. International Review of Community Engagement, 1(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.62941/irce.v1i3.136
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, J., Deng, X., Wu, T., & Wang, K. (2026). GenAI-supported flipped learning in preservice chemistry teacher education: Lesson-design performance, learning attitude, self-regulated learning, and critical thinking awareness. Behavioral Sciences, 16(4), 514. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs16040514
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Polygon : Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
