Compare Between Kriging And Fuzzy kriging (Centroid Method) With Application

Authors

  • Jaufar Mousa Mohammed University of Kirkuk
  • Dalia Badee Omar University of Kirkuk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/algoritma.v3i3.496

Keywords:

Kriging, abu vulkanik, Centroid method

Abstract

This research deals with a comparison of Kriging's method in predicting ordinary and fuzzy data in order to know the best method for future studies. Ordinary data was used in the field of depth of groundwater wells for 37 locations in Kirkuk city, and these data were fuzzy into fuzzy numbers of the trigonometric type that have a function of belonging, Then the centroid of each fuzzy number was found for the purpose of facilitating the calculations. An unknown point was predicted for both the ordinary and fuzzy data. After comparing the results with a standard of least variance, it was found that the fuzzy data had better results than the ordinary data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bardossy, A., Bogardi, I., & Kelly, W. E. (1990). Kriging with imprecise (fuzzy) variograms. I: Theory. Mathematical Geology, 22, 63–79.

Bohling, G. (2005). Introduction to geostatistics and variogram analysis (Vol. 1). Kansas Geological Survey.

Chichan, A. M. A., Fakhri, M. A., & Najim, Z. (2021). Comparison between iterative maximum likelihood estimators method and Bayesian method for estimating logistic regression model parameters with practical application. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 10(2), 259–270. Published by Kirkuk University.

Guo, D., Guo, R., & Thiart, C. (2003). Integrating GIS with fuzzy logic and geostatistics: Predicting air pollutant PM10 for California, using fuzzy kriging (Master’s thesis). [Institution not specified].

Hesamian, G., & Akbari, M. G. (2020). A kriging method for fuzzy spatial data. International Journal of Systems Science, 51(11), 1945–1958.

Lee, K. H. (2004). First course on fuzzy theory and applications (Vol. 27). Springer Science & Business Media.

Mohammed, J. M., Tawfeeq, A. F., & Aziz, M. M. (2022). Maximum likelihood for fuzzy pure spatial autoregressive model. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 13(1), 2267–2277.

Nielsen, A. A. (2009). Geostatistics and analysis of spatial data. Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, DTU, 7–12.

Quevedo, J. R. N. (2017). Fuzzy sets: A way to represent ambiguity and subjectivity. Boletín de Matemáticas, 24(1), 57–89.

Ross, T. J. (2005). Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Smith, T. E. (2015). Spatial data analysis. University of Pennsylvania, School of Engineering and Applied Science. [email protected]

Studzinski, J. (2011). Application of kriging algorithms for solving some water nets management tasks. In EnviroInfo (pp. 477–488).

Zhang, A. (2016). Statistical analysis of fuzzy linear regression model based on centroid method. Applied Mathematics, 7(7), 579–586.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-19

How to Cite

Jaufar Mousa Mohammed, & Dalia Badee Omar. (2025). Compare Between Kriging And Fuzzy kriging (Centroid Method) With Application . Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 3(3), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.62383/algoritma.v3i3.496

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian dan Angkasa

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian dan Angkasa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.