Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas X Materi SPLDV Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/algoritma.v2i6.282Keywords:
Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability, SPLDV, Adversity Quotient (AQ)Abstract
Mathematics plays a crucial role in developing students' problem-solving abilities and independence. Educators need to consider the varying characteristics of students when it comes to solving problems, one of which is their adversity quotient (AQ) level. The adversity quotient relates to a student's ability to handle complex problems or to overcome challenging situations. This research aims to analyze the mathematical problem-solving abilities of Class X students in the context of Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SPLDV) based on their Adversity Quotient (AQ). This qualitative, descriptive study involved selecting research subjects using an AQ questionnaire and was conducted in Class X. Data collection methods included testing, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis techniques included data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results indicate that subjects with the Climber type can understand problems, develop problem-solving plans, solve problems with accurate and appropriate steps, and use available information to re-check their answers. Subjects with the Camper type can understand problems, develop problem-solving plans, solve problems with accurate and appropriate steps, but often cannot use available information to re-check their answers. Subjects with the Quitter type can understand the problem and formulate a plan but struggle to solve the problem accurately and appropriately, and tend not to use available information to re-check their answers.
Downloads
References
Alin, Q., Kusmalyaldi, T. A. L., & Usodo, B. (2017). The effectiveness of numbered heads together with guided discovery learning viewed from adversity quotient. The 1st Education and Language International Conference Proceedings Center for International Language Development of Unissula, 655-664.
Ardianto, D., Budiyono, & Usodo, B. (2016). Model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL), team assisted individualization (TALI) dan student teams achievement divisions (STAD) dengan pendekatan saintifik terhadap pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan komputer matematis ditinjau dari ALQ. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(5), 510-524.
Balak, F., El-Rouadi, N., & Mushalrrafieh, J. (2015). Problem solving at the middle school level: A comparison of different strategies. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(3), 62-70.
Effendi, L. A. (2012). Pembelajaran matematika dengan metode penemuan terbimbing untuk meningkatkan kemampuan representasi dalam pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 13(2). Retrieved from http://jurnal.upi.edu/file/Leo_Aldhalr.pdf
Erdalwati, Nurdin. (2012). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan koneksi matematis peserta didik melalui pendekatan visual thinking. Tesis Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Faldjalr Shaldiq. (2009). Kemampuan Matematika. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Galneshal. (2014). Pengembangan model pembelajaran problem based learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah. Mimbal PGSD Universitas Pendidikan Galneshal.
Haldi, S., & Raldiyaltul, R. (2014). Metode pemecahan masalah menurut Polya untuk mengembangkan kemampuan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika di sekolah menengah pertama. EDU-MALT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumalt.v2i1.603
Hudojo, H. (2003). Menyelami belajar matematika. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Isvinal, W. Y., Sugiarjati, T., & Kurnialti, D. (2015). Proses berpikir kreatif dalam memecahkan masalah sub pokok bahasan trapesium berdasarkan tingkat kecerdasan emosional (EQ) siswa kelas VIII-C SMP Negeri 1 Jember. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1(1), 1-7.
Jacob. (2010). Matematika sebagai pemecahan masalah. Bandung: Setia Budi.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Retrieved from https://bsnp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Permendikbud_Tahun2016_Nomor021.pdf
Kerkman, D. D., & Johnson, A. L. T. (2014). Challenging multiple-choice questions to engage critical thinking. The Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 9, 92-97. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eue&AN=101574386&site=ehost-live
Khalilani, A. Z., & Abdullah, S. M. S. (2018). Relationship between adversity quotient and academic well-being among Malaysian undergraduates. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 11(1), 51-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajsr.2018.51.55
Kriel, C. (2013). Creating a disposition for critical thinking in the mathematics classroom. Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial Conference of the South African Society for Engineering Education, (Cape Town), 11-12 June 2013.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Richard Y. Chang & P. Keith Kelly. (2003). Langkah-langkah pemecahan masalah. Jakarta: Penerbit PPM.
Salnjalyal, Winal. (2013). Penelitian Pendidikan (Jenis, Metode, Prosedur). Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity quotient: mengubah halangan menjadi peluang. (T. Hermalyal, Trans.). Jakarta, Indonesia: Gralsindo.
Sugiarjto. (2010). Bahan ajar workshop pendidikan matematika I. Semarang: Jurusan Matematika Unnes.
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2011). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarno, U. (2014). Kumpulan makalah berpikir dan disposisi matematis serta pembelajarannya. Bandung, Indonesia: FPMIPAL UPI.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian dan Angkasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
