Penalaran Abduktif Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/algoritma.v4i4.1009Keywords:
Abductive, Cognitive Style, Problem Solving, Qualitative Study, ReasoningAbstract
Abductive reasoning is the process of formulating conjectures to explain surprising observations. Although these conjectures are not necessarily true, this type of reasoning is highly helpful in problem-solving for determining the best solution strategy. This study aims to investigate the differences in abductive reasoning across different cognitive styles. This research method uses a qualitative descriptive approach. The participants in this study were 32 students. Two of them were then selected for in-depth interviews representing types of abductive reasoning. Data collection and analysis were carried out on students' work results and semi-structured interviews. Polya's problem-solving theory was used to analyze students' thinking processes using abductive reasoning. The analysis was conducted on all problem-solving steps, namely understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back. Students with a field independent cognitive style were able to recognize and understand the problem quickly and directly determine the appropriate formula. In contrast, students with a field dependent cognitive style tended to understand the problem globally, requiring more time to complete the questions.
Downloads
References
Aulia, R. A. (2016). Penerapan model Connected Mathematics Project (CMP) dengan metode hypnoteaching untuk meningkatkan kemampuan penalaran induktif matematis siswa [Disertasi doktor, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/24879
Hjelte, A., Schindler, M., & Nilsson, P. (2020). Kinds of mathematical reasoning addressed in empirical research in mathematics education: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 10(10), Article 289. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100289
Huang, J., & Chang, K.-C. C. (2023). Towards reasoning in large language models: A survey. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 (pp. 1049–1065). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Klichowicz, A., Lippoldt, D., Rosner, A., & Krems, J. F. (2021). Information stored in memory affects abductive reasoning. Psychological Research, 85(8), 3172–3183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01460-8
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. University of Chicago Press.
Maulyda, M. A. (2020). Paradigma pembelajaran matematika berbasis NCTM. CV IRDH.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Harvard University Press.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Reid, D. A. (2018). Abductive reasoning in mathematics education: Approaches to and theorisations of a complex idea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92552
Shodikin, A., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., & Sudirman, S. (2021). Students’ thinking process when using abductive reasoning in problem solving. Acta Scientiae, 23(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6026
Sudirman, S., Son, A. L., Rosyadi, R., & Fitriani, R. (2020). Uncovering students’ mathematical concept understanding ability based on field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles in solving 3D geometry problems. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v10i1.3789
Valenta, A., Rø, K., & Klock, S. (2024). A framework for reasoning in school mathematics: Analyzing the development of mathematical claims. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10309-5
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047001001
Zahroh, A., Sadieda, L. U., & Lailiyah, S. (2025). Penalaran abduktif dalam menyelesaikan masalah aljabar. Jurnal PEKA (Pendidikan Matematika), 8(2), 160–168. https://jurnal.ummi.ac.id/index.php/peka/article/download/3247/1361/9621
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Algoritma : Jurnal Matematika, Ilmu pengetahuan Alam, Kebumian dan Angkasa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



